Sexual harassment is defined as unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature that violates the rights of an employee and constitutes a barrier to equity in the workplace. Given that sexual attention and harassment in the workplace are predominantly targeted at and committed against women, for purposes of this article victims will be referred to in the feminine and harassers in the masculine. The arbitrary permissibility of sexual attention in the workplace is problematic for three reasons. The first is that it creates a subjective test for sexual harassment where the victim is required to prove that the sexual attention received was unwelcomed by her again shifting the onus of proof on to the victim in order for it to constitute the prohibited conduct of sexual harassment. The existence and permissibility of sexual attention in the workplace performs exactly the same discriminatory function as sexual harassment.
Sexual Exploitation by Helping Professionals Sexual exploitation by a helping professional is a serious violation of your trust and, in many cases, the law. Low-wage work is more likely to take place in smaller, less formalized workplaces without official complaints mechanisms. On hearing the admissions made, the company issued a first and final warning to the individual respondents, gave an undertaking that all staff would be trained in sexual harassment and discrimination matters, and that such behaviour would not in the future sexuxl tolerated by any staff. Women who are targets may experience a range of negative consequences, including physical and mental health problems, career interruptions, and Hairy terry earnings. National Employment Law Project. Government should make separate laws dealing with this issue. This resulted in the Supreme Court issuing notices to the State and the Central Government to furnish the extent of implementation of the guidelines. Stalking Learn more about Articles on sexual harassment workplace cases behaviors to help you notice them harassmenf they escalate—and take steps to protect yourself. He touched her upper thigh and groin, and tried to remover her underpants. Workers filed 76, allegations overall of workplace harassment, a drop of 9.
New pics of naruto. daily headline
Tensions run high, and couples often make poor decisions in the heat Articles on sexual harassment workplace cases the moment. No charges were brought, but inthe boy's family sued the city of Brockton. Bischoff, who is a former human resources official. We cannot provide any kind of advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies. In addition, the company will require sexual harassment training for full-time and freelance employees, and ensure that it achieves pay parity in and a ratio of female to male employees by If you paid for your original order by check, LegalZoom will mail a check for the applicable amount to your billing address. Additional costs may apply. After being in the spotlight throughout the Naked w, sexual harassment is popping up in the news again. Any price difference between the original order and the replacement order or, if a replacement order is not completed within 60 days of purchase, the full original purchase price in each case less any money paid to government entities or other third parties will be credited to the original form of payment. Martin overhauled the anti-sexual harassment and complaint system, which now boasts a zero-tolerance policy. LegalZoom provides access to independent attorneys and self-help services at Naked twin teens specific direction.
The Chicago-based company said it has more than 14, locations in the United States with some , workers.
- In addition to certain guarantees provided by law, LegalZoom guarantees your satisfaction with our services and support.
- The awareness of the prevalence of sexual harassment rose to a much higher level in with national attention spotlighting entertainment, government, media and other industries across the country.
- Emery Lindsley was addressing her food and beverage staff at the Omni Corpus Christi Hotel in Texas in when a corporate executive suddenly placed his hand over her mouth to keep her from speaking.
Elyse Shaw, M. Workplace sexual harassment is widespread, with studies estimating that anywhere from almost a quarter to more than eight in ten women experience it in their lifetimes Feldblum and Lipnic Sexual harassment and assault at work have serious implications for women and for their employers.
Women who are targets may experience a range of negative consequences, including physical and mental health problems, career interruptions, and lower earnings. In addition, sexual harassment may limit or discourage women from advancing into higher paid careers and may contribute to the persistent gender wage gap. It may also intersect with other forms of discrimination and harassment on the basis of race or ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, or disability.
It also provides recommendations for preventing sexual harassment and reducing the negative effects of harassment for individuals and workplaces. The U. While sexual assault is a criminal offense, the law also recognizes sexual harassment as a form of employment discrimination.
EEOC a. EEOC b. EEOC Between and , women made eight in ten sexual harassment charges to the EEOC; 20 percent were made by men Frye Among women, Black women were the most likely of all racial and ethnic groups to have filed a sexual harassment charge Research suggests that only a small number of those who experience harassment one in ten ever formally report incidents of harassment—let alone make a charge to the EEOC—because of lack of accessible complaints processes, simple embarrassment, or fear of retaliation Cortina and Berdahl This fear is justified: according to an analysis of EEOC data, 71 percent of charges in FY included a charge of retaliation Frye In the EEOC convened a Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace to better understand why harassment persists in so many workplaces and what can help prevent it.
Identifying work-related factors associated with increased risk of sexual harassment and assault in the workplace may help target efforts to eliminate sexual harassment in particular occupations and situations. Some key risk factors include:. The survey also found that many women employees continue to work in tipped jobs in spite of harassment because tips are an important part of their income Rodriguez and Reyes Isolation leaves women vulnerable to abusers who may feel emboldened by a lack of witnesses Feldblum and Lipnic Frontline reported in that ABM described as the largest employer of janitors had 42 lawsuits brought against it in the previous two decades for allegations of workplace sexual harassment, assault, or rape Yeung A National Domestic Workers Alliance and University of Chicago report found that 36 percent of live-in workers surveyed reported having been harassed, threatened, insulted or verbally abused in the previous 12 months Burnham and Theodore Undocumented workers or those on temporary work visas can be at particular risk of harassment and assault.
Agriculture, food processing and garment factories, and domestic work and janitorial services are fields where many undocumented and immigrant women work Bauer and Ramirez ; Hegewisch, Deitch, and Murphy ; Yeung and Rubenstein ; Yeung In principle, victims of sexual violence at work who bring charges have the same protection against deportation as survivors of domestic violence through U-visas Hyunhye Cho Yet, many fear that reporting harassment or assault will put their immigration status at risk.
Others may not know their rights or may find it difficult to access legal supports without knowing English. Women working in occupations where they are a small minority, particularly in very physical environments Willness, Steel, and Lee or environments focused on traditionally male-oriented tasks Fitzgerald et al. In a survey from the early s, close to six in ten women working in construction report being touched or asked for sex LeBreton and Loevy A RAND study of sexual assault and harassment in the military estimated that 26 percent of active duty women had experienced sexual harassment or gender discrimination in the past year, including almost five percent who had experienced one or more sexual assaults compared with seven and one percent of active duty men, respectively; National Defense Research Institute A recent National Academy of Sciences study documented high levels of harassment of women faculty and staff in academia in science, engineering, and medicine, with women in academic medicine reporting more frequent gender harassment than their female colleagues in science and engineering National Academy of Sciences These structural risk factors often intersect and are exacerbated by racism, discrimination, and harassment on the basis of age, disability, or national origin.
Low-wage work is more likely to take place in smaller, less formalized workplaces without official complaints mechanisms. Earning low wages may also make it more difficult for a worker to leave a job, or to risk losing it by making a complaint.
Sexual harassment and assault can affect individuals in a number of ways, including their mental and physical health, finances, and opportunities to advance in their careers. A number of studies indicate that sexual harassment has negative mental health effects.
These effects can last for many years after the harassment Dansky and Kilpatrick ; Houle et al. Even when relatively infrequent and less severe, harassment can have significant negative effects on psychological well-being and work behaviors Schneider, Swan, and Fitzgerald In addition to negative mental health effects, researchers have found higher risks of long-term physical health problems in response to repeated, long-term gender-based harassment Schneider, Tomaka, and Palacios Harassment can also lead to increased risks of workplace accidents by leaving workers distracted while working in a dangerous job Sugerman These negative effects can often lead to significant costs for both mental and physical health services.
For women in the academic sciences, engineering, and medicine, a recent study found that harassment affects their career advancement by leading them to give up tenure opportunities, drop out of major research projects, or step down from leadership opportunities to avoid the perpetrator National Academy of Sciences Unemployment is a concern for some women who feel they must leave a job due to sexual harassment before finding another job opportunity The Nation A recent study finds a high correlation between harassment and job change: eight in ten women who experienced sexual harassment began a new job within two years after experiencing harassment compared with just over half of other working women.
The study found considerable financial stress as a result of such job change, highlighting likely long-term consequences of harassment for earnings and career attainment. Harassment contributed to financial strain even when women were able to find work soon after leaving their previous employment McLaughlin, Uggen, and Blackstone As a result of harassment, some women may leave their field entirely National Academy of Sciences The impact of sexual harassment, however, is significant no matter the amount of the wages lost: both those with high and low incomes may rely on this money to meet basic needs and achieve economic security.
Workplace harassment can result in substantial costs to companies, including legal costs if there are formal charges of harassment, costs related to employee turnover, and costs related to lower productivity from increased absences, lower motivation and commitment, and team disruption. While there are no recent estimates of the business costs of sexual harassment, earlier studies suggest these costs are substantial. An estimate based on a study of the costs of sexual harassment in the U.
Merit Systems Protection Board High profile sexual harassment cases highlight the potential legal costs of tolerating harassment for employers Fortune Typically, the amount of financial payouts in settlements is kept confidential, making it difficult to reliably estimate total legal costs related to harassment.
These costs likely substantially underestimate the actual payouts made by employers in response to sexual harassment charges because the EEOC litigates only a small number of all charges it receives Rutherglen Research shows that sexual harassment in the workplace can increase employee turnover Chan et al. Costs related to employee turnover constitute the largest economic cost of sexual harassment, considerably higher than costs related to litigation Merken and Shah An analysis The National Health Interview Survey found that those who reported having been harassed or bullied at work in the previous year were 1.
A S. Merit Systems Protection Board study found that close to one in six employees who experienced sexual harassment took sick or annual leave following their harassment.
There is substantial research to show that workplace sexual harassment is associated with reduced motivation and commitment, as well as lower job satisfaction and withdrawal. One study of 27 teams at a food services organization found that sexual hostility—a form of sexual harassment that consists of explicitly sexual verbal and nonverbal behaviors that are insulting—is damaging for team processes and performance Raver and Gelfand Based on their meta-analysis of research on the antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment, Willness et al.
Providing resources and training and the development of new tools to prevent and address workplace sexual harassment and assault are critical to making workplaces safer for all workers and capture resulting productivity gains.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, the U. Census Bureau, the U. Bauer, Mary, and Monica Ramirez. Food Industry. Boushey, Heather, and Sarah Jane Glynn. Burnham, Linda, and Nik Theodore. Coalition of the Immokalee Workers. Cortina, Lilith M.
Julian Barling and Cary L. Cooper, — Dansky, Bonnie S. Faley, Robert H. Kustis and Cathy L. Feldblum, Chai and Victoria Lipnic. Feldblum and Victoria A. Fitzgerald, Louise F. Travis and Jacquelyn W. Hulin, Michele J. Gelfand, and Vicki J.
May 11, Frye, Jocelyn. Houle, Jason N. Mortimer, Christopher Uggen, and Amy Blackstone. Hyunhye Cho, Eunice. National Employment Law Project. Khubchandani, Jagdish and James H. LeBreton, Laurie W.
Breaking New Ground: Worksite Chicago Women in the Trades. Merkin, Rebecca S. National Academy of Sciences. National Defense Research Institute. Purl, Justin, Kathleen E. Hall, and Rodger W.
Despite the layers of laws, critics say many employer programs are too superficial to completely thwart such behavior. Marsh intends to vigorously defend this matter. The lack of trust manifests itself as a self-perpetuating quandary: Women are hesitant to approach human resources departments, and those departments cite the absence of complaints as proof of a respectful workplace. Get the latest employment and labor law news and resources straight to your email inbox. It took years for her to find an attorney to move the case to move forward.
Articles on sexual harassment workplace cases. 2017 Sexual Harassment Cases & Reports
The executive then began commenting on the appearance of a woman on Ms. Lindsley recalled. Lindsley said in an interview. The recent outpouring of complaints from women about mistreatment in the workplace has included numerous accounts of being ignored, stymied or retaliated against by human resources units — accounts that portray them as part of the problem, not the solution. The lack of trust manifests itself as a self-perpetuating quandary: Women are hesitant to approach human resources departments, and those departments cite the absence of complaints as proof of a respectful workplace.
A study by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported that of all the options available to workers experiencing harassment — avoiding the harasser or consulting with family members, for instance — the least common response of either men or women was to take some formal action.
Experts point to several contributing factors. Human resources departments, while officially responsible for fielding employee complaints, also work for a company that faces potential liability — an inherent conflict of interest. And for some human resource officers, conducting an investigation into harassment allegations against a top executive or star performer can be hazardous to their own careers. The result can often be that human resources personnel are more inclined to suppress allegations than get to the bottom of them.
The Uber engineer Susan Fowler said she had seen that calculus play out firsthand when she reported inappropriate messages from her manager to human resources. Fowler wrote in a blog post about her experience.
At best, human resources officials may be caught in a thankless bind. You need to have a strong sense of self to have the wherewithal to do this kind of work. Often employees fear that human resources will help the company lash out at the accuser rather than punish the accused. Kamee Verdrager, an employment lawyer in New Hampshire and Massachusetts, filed a legal complaint that said her supervisors at the law firm Mintz Levin, her former employer, gave her less meaningful work and unfairly harsh performance evaluations after she spoke up about experiencing harassment and after she went on maternity leave.
The firm later demoted and fired her. Verdrager were putting the dispute behind them. According to the suit, a human resources official responded to Ms.
After receiving a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress syndrome stemming from her job, Ms. Santana went on unpaid leave from the company. Marsh intends to vigorously defend this matter. Lindsley, the former Omni director, started as a server at an Omni Hotel restaurant and eventually became the first woman to be named director of food and beverage at a hotel. During the past few months, there have been numerous, well-documented sexual harassment claims made against a number of Hollywood icons.
However, the culture of sexual misconduct extends well beyond those starring on the Silver Screen. Recently, 21st Century Fox has been in the news for all the wrong reasons. In mid-January, a former Vice President of Enterprise Rights Management for the studio filed a lawsuit claiming that she was repeatedly sexually harassed by her superiors and eventually terminated because of her gender.
In addition to sexual harassment and gender discrimination , she is suing 21st Century Fox for retaliation and violation of public policy. That year, the financial institution settled with a senior female fixed-income banker who filed a lawsuit claiming mistreatment of female employees and significant differences in pay for male and female employees.
Despite the fact that the banking industry and Wall Street have long been known for a culture of gender and wage discrimination , many of these institutions have avoided the recent flurry of sexual harassment allegations that have been so prominent in Hollywood; news organizations; Washington, D. However, earlier this month a managing director at Bank of America was let go after a female analyst accused him of making sexual advances and engaging in relationships with female subordinates.
Unfortunately, some Bank of America executives reportedly told employees to let clients know that he left to pursue another career opportunity. The industry has long been known for allowing those executives who have been accused of sexual harassment at work to leave their jobs in good standing, choosing to handle these allegations on their own terms.
Although more and more employees are now feeling empowered to come forward to report sexual harassment in the workplace, the above examples illustrate how widespread cultures of sexual harassment are in a variety of industries. After all, sexual harassment is illegal, and employees are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of as well as many state laws. To learn more about sexual harassment in the workplace, download our free Guide to Sex Discrimination and Harassment in the Workplace.
QHRC : Sexual harassment case studies
Warning: These are real life examples and contain language and content which may offend. These sexual harassment case summaries are grouped into two categories: court and tribunal decisions, and conciliated outcomes.
Court and tribunal decisions are made after all the evidence is heard, including details of loss and damage. The full text of court and tribunal decisions is available from:. Conciliated outcomes are where the parties have reached an agreement through conciliation at the Queensland Human Rights Commission. Summary: A cleaner at a school was sexually harassed when two of his co-workers, one male and one female, set up a staff room to appear as though two staff members had used the room for a sex romp.
The prank was directed at the cleaner, and the room was set up with empty alcohol bottles, clothes, and a condom containing fluid.
The male co-worker invited the cleaner to sniff boxer shorts left in the room. The cleaner was distressed by the scene, including that he thought he was cleaning up bodily fluids. He was also upset and concerned that two named staff members were having an affair and had used the school premises to get together.
He was preoccupied with the sex romp to the point that he intended to speak to one of the staff members who he thought was involved. At that time the male co-worker involved in the prank told the cleaner that it had all been a prank. On hearing this, the cleaner fell to his knees.
It was undisputed that the setting up of the room was conduct of a sexual nature. The tribunal found that because the prank was directed at the cleaner, the conduct was in relation to him. The tribunal found it was also sexual harassment of the cleaner when the male co-worker invited him to sniff the boxer shorts, and when that co-worker informed staff in a nearby shop of the prank. The tribunal found the cleaner had been victimised after complaining of sexual harassment.
The male co-worker had pretended to photograph or video the cleaner when he was at the school, and had gestured with his middle finger to the cleaner's wife and children at the school. The cleaner suffered an acute anxiety state because of the prank, and within a month he was unable to work.
He suffered an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depression, and his psychological condition developed into post-traumatic stress disorder.
His condition caused problems sleeping and concentrating, fatigue, rapid heart rate, trembling, obsessive thinking, eating and stomach problems, compulsive behaviours, bouts of crying, depressed mood, and feelings of hopelessness and anxiety. He was unable to work for two years, and was then only able to return to part-time work.
The tribunal considered he would be unable to return to full-time work for a further two years. The tribunal stressed the importance of consistency in awards, particularly as required under the QCAT Act. The tribunal also examined the six cases where Richardson has been cited in other Australian jurisdictions. That examination shows that although there have been some increases in the level of awards, those increases have not been nearly as dramatic as in Richardson itself.
The tribunal concluded that where there is a recognisable personal injury, the tribunal should continue the approach of consistency with Queensland court awards in personal injury cases.
However, where there is no recognisable personal injury and therefore no comparable Queensland awards, the tribunal can be influenced by Richardson to increase its level of awards, if it is appropriate to do so.
When considering previous awards, those awards should be adjusted for inflation. Advocates would assist the tribunal in adjusting previous awards for inflation when citing them.
The tribunal also determined that interest on non-financial loss should be awarded unless there is a proper reason for not doing so, though not at a commercial rate. Summary : A young woman was sexually harassed when she woke to find an older man naked in her bedroom.
He touched her upper thigh and groin, and tried to remover her underpants. She told him to leave and broke down crying. The woman's employer had arranged for her to share the work-provided accommodation with the man. They each had their own room, and the woman had moved in the night before the sexual harassment.
The woman was unable to take up her new job as planned, and she suffered post-traumatic stress disorder and depressive symptoms. She was unable to work from the incident which happened on 1 December until March The tribunal found that the personal injury to the woman caused by the sexual assault on her was severe and prolonged.
Issues the tribunal considered and decided included whether the sexual harassment occurred in the course of the man's employment, the credibility of the woman and the extent to which the sexual harassment caused her injuries, and how damages should be assessed.
Summary : A female traffic control worker, who was sexually harassed by a male co-worker, made a complaint against the worker as well the private company that employed them and the company that contracted the employer.
During the pre-trail proceedings, the claims against both companies were settled. As a preliminary issue, the tribunal decided that the settlements with the companies released them from liability, but the release did not extend to the individual co-worker.
For five months the woman was subjected to personal comments, questions, noises, and gestures — all of a sexual nature — on a daily basis and throughout each shift.
The woman tried to work the next day but couldn't cope, and she resigned that night. She experienced an emotional breakdown which became a Major Depressive Disorder. The tribunal found that the sexual harassment was a substantial cause of the woman's condition, the effects of which would continue over a period of three years, including an inability to work.
The settlement amounts paid by the two companies and any lump sum payment for permanent impairment by WorkCover would be deducted from the total award. In the reasons for the decision, the tribunal discussed the coping mechanisms and decisions of women subjected to unwanted sexual comments in male-dominated workplaces. While the ideal course would be for the woman to make it clear that the comments are unwanted, and then if they continue, to complain to management, the tribunal recognised that this is not always practical, especially if the employer is unlikely to be supportive, and if making unsubstantiated allegations is regarded as a disciplinary matter.
In this case, the woman's way of dealing with it was to go along with the banter to some extent, and hide her true feelings in the belief she could cope with the harassment.
She was committed to her job and did not want to jeopardise it by reporting the sexual harassment. In the end, the woman could not cope and this resulted in greater damage to her.
Summary : A complaint of sexual harassment by a part-time worker in a hardware business was upheld when the tribunal found that the employer had failed to take sufficient action in relation to the employee's report of inappropriate behaviour. The alleged sexual harassment included kissing, touching her breasts and leg, persistent requests to have a drink outside work hours despite an ongoing refusal, asking for cuddles, telephoning her at home, and making repeated unsolicited sexual remarks.
The complainant reported the sexual harassment to her supervisor, but initially asked to be allowed to handle it herself. The supervisor granted her request and did not take any action until the formal complaint was made. The tribunal found that, even in these circumstances, the employer was vicariously liable for the acts of its employees.
It found the employer has an overriding responsibility to provide a workplace free from harassment, and that the wishes of complainants are secondary to this responsibility. Allegations of sexual harassment against another employee and claims of victimisation were dismissed. Summary Background: Ms Shepherd was a 23 year old woman employed by Mr Tuck, who owned and managed a marine survey business.
After two months, Ms Shepherd's employment was terminated on the basis, she alleged, that she would not engage in a personal relationship with him. She based her complaint on a series of incidents alleged to be sexual harassment. These included: statements of a sexual nature to and about her: blonde jokes apparently inferring that she was not intelligent , taking a photograph of another woman's legs and suggesting it be stuck on Ms Shepherd's office desk, gifts and a suggestion of shared accommodation while travelling in order to minimise costs.
Mr Tuck admitted he was attracted to Ms Shepherd, but said it was she who made advances to him and that she proposed a relationship. He countered the allegations with other claims. These included Ms Shepherd introducing herself by kissing him on the neck, not voicing any objection to shared accommodation, referring to herself as a slut, and dressing scantily in his presence.
Mr Tuck argued that Ms Shepherd's employment was terminated because of her inappropriate conduct while representing the company, her lack of capacity to do the tasks, and inadequate workplace performance. Examples included giving out company business cards to males in whom she was interested, making a serious error in a ship's manual and instead of correcting it as asked, going to have a drink with the ship's cook, refusing to do field work, putting personal matters before business appointments, and driving the company car after drinking alcohol.
On the issue of jokes, Mr Tuck said Ms Shepherd joined in the general joke-telling and humour of the office. Outcome: Member Pagani found that neither party was deliberately untruthful , and agreed in general on the facts. She found the main divergence was that Mr Tuck indicated he never intended offence, and Ms Shepherd said she was offended.
In terms of Mr Tuck's desire to have a relationship with Ms Shepherd, it was found that no reasonable person in her circumstances would have been offended by the proposal, had it been made by the first respondent as alleged.
In summing up, the Member said Ms Shepherd and Mr Tuck had shared a very casual, and personal, working relationship. The working environment was rough and tumble , but the complainant was an equal participant in it. The Member found that Ms Shepherd failed to prove her case to the required standard. Summary : A woman alleged a manager sexually harassed her when working for a club over a period of several years.
The allegations included touching her breasts, leering, and that comments of a sexual nature were made about her body. She stated she had complained to management several times and that the complaints were ignored.
She also alleged that as a woman she had been denied promotions offered to less experienced males at the club. As a result, she resigned. The manager and the employer denied the allegations, stating her attitude at work had deteriorated during her employment. The respondents also provided written apologies for any offence the complainant may have experienced. Summary : A man alleged sexual harassment against a male supervisor and his employer, a government authority.
It was also alleged that in the course of attempting to resolve the complaint the complainant experienced difficulties accessing the grievance mechanisms within the organisation. At a conciliation conference, the allegations were discussed and misunderstandings were identified, resulting in the complainant withdrawing his complaint against his supervisor. The complainant was able to detail his experience to the respondents and an agreement was reached which included the employer reviewing the grievance and investigation procedures to include quick reference summaries and flow charts to assist access and implementation of the mechanisms.
It was also agreed by the employer to increase training and awareness of appropriate work place behaviour, including detailed anti-discrimination and sexual harassment grievance mechanisms.
Summary : A man alleged that he had been sexually harassed at his place of work. He claimed one of his co-workers had exposed his anus to him, had run a piece of timber with splinters up between his legs to his groin, and had run his finger down between his buttocks.
When he objected, his co-workers began calling him obscene names regularly. The man said he had witnessed many male youths being subjected to the same treatment at the work place, with most of the young men resigning, and with one young man having attempted suicide. When he advised his foreman of this behaviour, he was told to ignore the men's actions. He claimed management had witnessed the behaviour, but had done nothing to rectify the problem.
At the conference, the individual respondents admitted to the behaviour but asserted that the actions had occurred only as a joke in an attempt to lighten the work environment. The senior managers stated that they were unaware of the behaviour, as the foremen had not notified them at any time of adverse behaviour occurring.
The company did admit that they had difficulties in getting young males to remain employed with them; however, they believed this may have been because young people didn't want to work. On hearing the admissions made, the company issued a first and final warning to the individual respondents, gave an undertaking that all staff would be trained in sexual harassment and discrimination matters, and that such behaviour would not in the future be tolerated by any staff.
The complaint was resolved as the complainant was satisfied with the company's undertaking and the individual men's apologies.